Your agents did the wrong thing again, and you found out afterward.
Wrong customer email sent. Branch force-pushed. Deploy shipped past approval. You run agents across lead gen, content, sales, and ops, and every one of them is one bad tool call from work you undo by hand. Your agent team needs a firewall: ThumbGate configures what should allow, warn, or deny before the agent writes, sends, deploys, or spends—and adds the regression proof.
You didn't hire AI agents to manage calendars of incidents.
Every repeat costs you twice: once when the agent gets it wrong, and again when you stop your own work to find it, undo it, and re-explain the rule that was already written down.
Drowning in operational agent tasks
Repeat failures eat strategic time: bad diffs, wrong sends, unsafe deploys, spend without proof.
Tried prompts before — quality drifts
Rules in markdown get skipped when the agent looks competent. You need a check before the tool runs.
US hires and GRC suites are slow capital
Months of process for a dashboard. The $499 offer hardens one concrete workflow in two business days after access.
From first call to a proved gate
We'll tell you if ThumbGate is the wrong fit. If you already paid and it is not a supported gate, we refund.
Fit check (15–60 min)
Map the repeated failure to a PreToolUse boundary. Submit the form above if you want fit before checkout.
Configure ALLOW / WARN / DENY
One local gate on the agreed workflow — not a multi-system rewrite.
Two business days after access
Regression test plus rollout and rollback evidence for the next similar action.
Before you go further, check whether this is actually yours.
This is for you if
You run one or more AI agents that take real actions — writing code, sending mail, updating records, deploying, spending. One specific action has gone wrong more than once. You can name the command, tool call, repo, or destination involved. You want the boundary enforced at the tool call, not restated in a prompt. You want to delegate more to your agents, not less, and you need a check you can point at before you do.
This is not for you if
The failure is a one-off you cannot reproduce. The problem is model quality rather than a risky action — a gate blocks a bad send, it does not make the draft better. You want an org-wide hosted policy, SSO, a shared audit dashboard, or a compliance certificate; those are separate scope and hosted Enterprise capabilities are not generally available. You want someone to run the workflow for you. ThumbGate constrains agents, it does not replace them.
Exactly what the $499 Enterprise Workflow Gate includes
One workflow, one 60-minute working review, one configured local gate and regression test, plus rollout and rollback proof within two business days after access and the agreed workflow materials are available.
You provide
A short intake, the accountable workflow owner, and non-secret examples or logs that show the repeated failure. Submit first if fit is unclear; an out-of-scope workflow does not require checkout.
You receive
A workflow and failure map, one configured local gate, its regression test, and written rollout, rollback, and verification proof for the agreed workflow.
Boundaries
The offer does not include multi-system implementation, legal or compliance certification, guaranteed savings, guaranteed incident prevention, or uncontracted hosted-team features.
Fit and refund boundary
If the repeated failure cannot be reduced to one supported ThumbGate gate, the $499 order is refunded instead of being silently converted into a larger service. This fence matches the Terms of Service Module B deliverable and refund language exactly.
This is the enterprise entry offer for one workflow. Multi-workflow rollout, ongoing monitoring, shared hosting, compliance work, and hosted Enterprise capabilities are not included or generally available. Legal summaries: Privacy · Security · Legal index.
Failure taxonomy
Classify the repeated action: bad context, missing approval, unsafe write, wrong target, or proof gap.
Gate split
Define what should block automatically, warn the operator, or route to human review with evidence attached.
Proof checklist
Leave with the verification steps needed to prove the next similar action is caught before execution.
Use this for real agent workflows
Code and PR agents
Repeated bad diffs, missing tests, unsafe merges, or unclear ownership around generated changes.
Browser and ops agents
Agents clicking, posting, updating CRMs, or moving money without the right boundary proof.
Customer-visible automation
Email, support, billing, or publishing workflows where a repeat mistake costs trust.
How ThumbGate stacks up
Same problem, four ways to pay for it. Compare on what you spend before the first hard boundary exists.
| DIY prompts | US full-time platform hire | Typical VA / freelance ops | ThumbGate diagnostic | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting cost | Model + review time | $5,500–7,000+/mo loaded | $2,500–5,000/mo | $499 once |
| Time to first hard boundary | Manual upkeep | 2–4 months | 1–5 weeks (varies) | 2 business days after access |
| If the match is wrong | You keep thrashing | Costly to replace | Restart search | Refund if not a supported fit |
Questions before you book checkout
npx thumbgate init.Two paths from here.
Path one: close this tab and keep paying for the same repeat — you find it after it lands, you undo it by hand, and the rule stays written in a file the agent can skip.
Path two: send the one workflow that keeps failing and get it back as a configured gate with a regression test and written rollout and rollback proof, two business days after access.
Refunded if the failure cannot be reduced to one supported ThumbGate gate. Runs locally on your machine. Want the free path first? npx thumbgate init — no account, nothing sent to us. See the verification evidence.